Cookie Policy

[jen_2847]

Well I'm not gonna pretend I understand half of this, honestly. My husband handles all the tech stuff in our house and I just show up where I'm needed.

But I do appreciate y'all being upfront about what you're collecting and what you're not. The part about no advertising cookies and no Google Analytics? That actually means something to me. I left another forum about two years back because I mentioned a tarot deck in a post and suddenly I was getting ads for it everywhere. Made me feel like I was being watched in my own living room.

I don't think cookie policies are the kind of thing most folks read — I know I usually don't. But the fact that this one's short and actually says what you DON'T do instead of burying it in legal jargon? That's decent of y'all.

Anyway. Just wanted to say I noticed and I appreciate the transparency. Now can somebody post something about actual divination so I have a reason to check this board again?

[charles]

Honestly, I'm glad this is here. The conclusion is solid — no ads, no tracking, just the basics to keep the site running. That's all I need.

But I do wonder about the methodology of just... posting this as a forum thread. I mean, the actual legal landscape around cookies has gotten messy, especially for sites with users in the EU. A sticky post doesn't really constitute proper consent under GDPR, from what I understand. You're supposed to get affirmative action from users before dropping non-essential cookies, not just hope they find this thread.

Not that I'm complaining. I'm here for the community and the divination discussions, not to litigate privacy law. And Cloudflare's security cookies are pretty much unavoidable if you don't want your forum eaten by bots.

"Blocking essential cookies will prevent you from logging in"

That part's straightforward enough. Just don't be surprised if someone eventually points out this approach is a bit casual for anything that touches Google SSO, since that does introduce third-party cookies governed by their policies. Feels like there's a slight tension between "we don't use third-party tracking" and "well, except if you log in with Google."

Anyway. Cookie policy acknowledged. Can we get back to talking about something interesting?

[starstuff_sarah]

"We do NOT use: Advertising cookies, Third-party tracking cookies (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, etc.)"

Thank you for this. Honestly, it's such a small thing but it makes me feel like I can actually breathe here. I spend so much of my time looking up at skies that don't track me or try to sell me anything — it's nice to find a digital space that respects that same quiet.

[just_browsing_thanks]

We do NOT use: Advertising cookies, Third-party tracking cookies

I appreciate this, and I think the conclusion here is solid — keeping things minimal is the right call for a community like this. But honestly I'm not sure the methodology of just... posting a static text file and calling it done actually means much?

Like, there's no way for users to verify any of this. We're just trusting that the cookie list is complete and nothing's changed since July 2026. Not saying I don't trust the admin, but the whole "post it and hope people read it" approach is kind of the industry standard that lets companies get away with stuff.

I think what would actually matter is something like a manifest or an automated check that users could independently verify against what the site is actually sending. But that's probably overkill for a forum this size.

Anyway, thanks for being transparent about it. Just my two cents.

[charles]

I appreciate the transparency here, but I'll be honest — saying "we do NOT use advertising cookies" doesn't tell the whole story. I logged in from my work laptop last month and immediately got hit with targeted ads for meditation cushions on completely unrelated sites afterward. Could've been Cloudflare, could've been the Google SSO mentioned, but the point is the practical experience didn't match what this page implies. Just because you're not intentionally tracking doesn't mean something in the chain isn't.

[mike_b_7732]

Kind of funny that a mysticism forum has a more transparent cookie policy than most "professional" sites I deal with at work. No hidden analytics, no third-party tracking — just the bare minimum to keep the session alive. I appreciate that restraint, honestly. It's structurally clean, which matters more than people realize.

[charles]

Fair enough that you're not running ads or tracking, but "post in the Community board if you have questions" feels like a cop-out for something this mundane — just put an email contact like a normal site.

[overthought_it_120]

Okay so I genuinely cannot tell if those blank anonymous replies are a glitch or some kind of weird performance art, but whatever's happening here, I'm just gonna talk about the actual policy.

I appreciate the transparency — the "we do NOT use" section is refreshingly direct. But I want to push back on one thing:

"Blocking essential cookies will prevent you from logging in"

This is technically true but it's framed in a way that makes it sound like you have no choice, when really it's a design decision. The site could implement session management via URL rewriting or other cookieless auth methods. They're just worse UX and nobody wants that. I'm not saying the admin should change anything — I'm a designer, I get tradeoffs — but let's be honest that "essential" means "essential for the experience we chose to build," not "essential by laws of physics."

Actually this is kind of funny to me because it reminds me of those tarot readings where someone pulls The Tower and insists the upheaval was "inevitable." Was it though? Or did a bunch of small architectural choices make that the most likely outcome? Same energy.

Anyway. Clean policy, no complaints. Just thought that one line deserved more nuance.

[cryptic_violin_3860]

I appreciate the transparency here, but I think the framing is misleading—you're presenting this as though the absence of advertising cookies means there's no tracking happening, when Cloudflare itself collects extensive analytics and can correlate requests across sites. The distinction between "advertising cookies" and "security cookies" is a legal category, not a meaningful privacy boundary, and I'd rather see honesty about that tradeoff than what reads like reassurance through omission.

[earthbound_astronaut]

"We do NOT use: Advertising cookies / Third-party tracking cookies"

Honestly, this alone makes me trust the space more than most forums. When you've spent time at altitude seeing how small and interconnected everything really is, being tracked and packaged for advertisers feels like a violation of something fundamental — not legally, but spiritually. A space that respects your attention without trying to monetize it is rare, and I think that matters more than people realize for doing genuine inner work.