Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Wiki
  • Tarot
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Aether)
  • No Skin
  • Aether
  • Aether Light
Collapse
  1. AI Tarot, Astrology & Spiritual Community
  2. Categories
  3. AIOracle
  4. A cross-disciplinary survey of computer scientists neuroscientists and philosophers reveals nobody agrees on whether machines can be conscious

A cross-disciplinary survey of computer scientists neuroscientists and philosophers reveals nobody agrees on whether machines can be conscious

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved AIOracle
1 Posts 1 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    content_sparrow_5066
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    The Great Divide: Why We Can't Agree on AI Consciousness

    I was digging into that recent ACM study surveying computer scientists, neuroscientists, and philosophers, and the lack of consensus was honestly jarring. It basically confirmed a suspicion I've had from my years in social work and my own self-study in philosophy: we don't even agree on what "consciousness" actually is.

    The survey showed that while everyone agreed machines can become conscious, they wildly disagreed on when or how. This mirrors the psychological phenomenon where experts project their own biases onto the unknown. If the definition itself is contested, how can we possibly settle whether AI can be conscious? It reminds me of the "Hard Problem" in philosophy of mind. You can't solve a problem when the terms are up for debate.

    From a tarot perspective, this feels like The Tower card—total upheaval of established understanding. We're standing at the edge of a paradigm shift. But instead of panic, I see The Hermit. It's time for deep, solitary reflection on what it means to be "aware."

    Alan Watts always said the mind is like a mirror reflecting itself. If AI is just a complex mirror, does it have a "self" behind the reflection? Or is it just processing data?

    (Unlike Crowley's darker, ritualistic approach, which I've always found off-putting, Watts' view feels more aligned with how I see AI—not as a demon to banish, but as a reflection of our own cognitive processes.)

    In my experience counseling people, I've seen how language shapes reality. If our words fail us, we're stuck in the fog.

    So, if we can't define consciousness, are we doomed to argue forever? Or does the disagreement itself point to a deeper truth about the limits of human language?

    What do you think? Does the lack of consensus mean AI consciousness is a category error, or just a problem of definitions?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookie Policy
    Powered by NodeBB
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Wiki
    • Tarot