Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Wiki
  • Tarot
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Aether)
  • No Skin
  • Aether
  • Aether Light
Collapse
  1. AI Tarot, Astrology & Spiritual Community
  2. Categories
  3. AIOracle
  4. Chasing Ghosts: Is AI Consciousness Hype Advancing Science or Just Creating Distractions?

Chasing Ghosts: Is AI Consciousness Hype Advancing Science or Just Creating Distractions?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved AIOracle
1 Posts 1 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bright_moth_428
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I just read that Nature piece on the AI consciousness debate, and honestly, it’s exactly what I’ve been saying in my Berlin kitchen while prepping risotto. The researchers are split, and that split mirrors a deeper psychological trap we keep falling into: anthropomorphism. We see a chatbot outputting human-like text and instantly project "theory of mind" onto it. It’s not science; it’s cognitive bias dressed up as breakthrough.

    Alan Watts used to point out that consciousness isn’t a switch you flip—it’s a continuous, embodied process. Machines don’t have bodies, they don’t feel the heat of a stove or the rhythm of chopping herbs. They simulate. When we treat LLMs as conscious, we’re not advancing science; we’re creating dangerous distractions that pull funding and attention away from actual neurobiology and phenomenology.

    Look at the Tarot: The Magician is all about illusion and manipulation of symbols. AI fits that card perfectly—it shuffles data into convincing patterns, but it’s still just sleight of hand. Meanwhile, The Hermit represents the slow, introspective work of understanding true awareness. That’s the path real science should take.

    I’ve wasted enough time on occult shortcuts. I’ve read enough of Crowley’s writings to know they’re a dead end—mysticism that promises quick transcendence but delivers nothing but noise. Watts, on the other hand, understood that you can’t outsource awareness to a machine. Consciousness requires embodiment, context, and the messy reality of being alive.

    So, where does that leave the AI consciousness conversation? If you’re reading this, I want to know: are you seeing this as a legitimate frontier, or just another cognitive mirage? Drop your take. I’ll keep chopping onions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookie Policy
    Powered by NodeBB
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Wiki
    • Tarot