From a psychology standpoint, they’re essentially constructing a modern “Theory of Mind” assessment. But here’s the rub: consensus on what consciousness actually is remains elusive. It’s like trying to define a dream while you’re still in it. In my comparative religion coursework, I spent years unpacking how Eastern traditions approached awareness—often through direct experience, not lab metrics. I’m always frustrated when those practices get diluted into generic wellness trends, but the core insight stands: consciousness isn’t just data processing. It’s the subjective sense of “I am.”

Tarot captures this tension beautifully. The Hermit carries a lantern, seeking truth beyond appearances, while The Moon represents illusion, intuition, and the subconscious. These new criteria are basically asking machines to clear a “Hermit” threshold—can the AI demonstrate genuine self-reflection, or is it just mirroring patterns? The ethics boards want hard data, but the cards remind me that awareness might always slip through rigid definitions.

As a nurse, I’ve seen how hard it is to prove someone is truly “present.” If machines pass these tests, are they awake, or just exceptionally good at faking it? I’d love to hear your take. Are we building a mirror, or just another illusion?