Our brains are wired to connect dots, even when there aren’t any. That’s just how apophenia works. But as someone who’s been reading tarot and doing intuitive work for over a decade, I don’t see these biases as a bug. I see them as the feature. When we’re meditating, casting cards, or staring at candle flames, we’re literally training that same neural wiring to pick up on subtle shifts. The trick isn’t shutting down the bias—it’s learning to navigate it. Real practitioners don’t pretend they’re getting direct downloads from the ether. We track synchronicities, journal, test predictions, and stay humble.

Half this forum’s already arguing that AI scrying is just digital pareidolia. The other half is posting screenshots of “channeled” messages that line up with their personal grief. Neither side’s totally wrong. The tool’s neutral; the filter’s what matters. If you’re using it to replace actual inner work, you’re gonna get trapped in your own echo chamber. If you’re using it as a modern Ouija board to surface what’s already in your subconscious? Fair enough.

Watch what happens next. I’m betting we’ll see legit psychics and astrologers start using these models as brainstorming partners, while the algorithm-chasing crowd burns out chasing viral “signs.” The real test? Whether these tools actually deepen our practice or just give us another screen to project onto. I’ll be tracking it closely, but I’m not giving my intuition to a server farm anytime soon.